Before reading
Richard Louv’s chapter on natural school reform, I had never heard of the
environment-based learning. I was raised in the dry structure of school. Often
I was taught in windowless rooms. There was an emphasis on separating the
student from distractions (windows, outside, etc.) and that would aid learning.
To an extent I think it does the opposite. Creating this separation between
school and outside life causes the boring school phenomenon. If students were
taught outside and with a hands-on style, then schooling becomes more
interesting to students and in turn they learn better.
Wasn’t
school supposed to be boring? With the research and example Louv presents it
seems like there could be a better way. Environment-based learning has
astounding effects on students' grades and enthusiasm. I agree that environment
based learning could help fix the problem riddled education system of the
United States.
Louv
also makes the point that universities and standard education produces
narrow-minded masses. The United States education system seems to leave
creativity out of the curriculum. Creativity is the backbone of problem
solving. Education should breed good problem solvers because our world is full
of problems.
In my
personal experience, I have learned a great deal in the school system without
applying it to my ‘real’ life. The examples of environment-based education in
this chapter make the link by teaching students about the same topics they
would learn but applying those topics to their local environment. For example
students may check pH of local streams in order to understand chemistry and how
that pH effects aquatic life in order to understand biology. I think this is
one of most important aspects of education, learning and then applying what you
learned.
No comments:
Post a Comment