My
research paper was on the 30-Mile Meal here in Athens and also on whether or
not local food is actually better for the environment. I found a lot of research on both sides of
the issue, some saying local food is better and others that disagreed with that
notion. It was fascinating that so many
people could look at this one issue and have so many varying opinions on the
matter. While some people spoke about
food miles, the distance food travels to get to your plate, other talked about
greenhouses and how much energy it took to produce fruit and vegetables that
wouldn’t grow in that location otherwise.
I found out that shipping food by railway is ten times less harmful than
shipping the food on the back of a tractor trailer. I also found out that in some cases it is
actually more environmentally friendly to have food shipped in instead of
trying to grow it where you live. The
example given in one of the articles I read talked about having tomatoes
shipped from Spain instead of trying to grow them in greenhouses in
Sweden. The author concluded that if the
Spanish tomatoes were grown in fields in the sun and those farmers didn’t have
to add an expensive system to water the plants that even after they are shipped
all the way to Sweden they still required less fossil fuel to get there then it
would have taken to grow them in a greenhouse in Sweden. After reading all of the articles that I
found I decided that it would be best to eat local food, but only when that
food is not grown in a greenhouse. Also,
if you can cut down on meat, especially beef, it would help as well since
animals produce methane that is also harmful. In order to make you diet more
environmentally friendly the key is to try to eat only local food that is
currently in season and not grown in a greenhouse.
No comments:
Post a Comment